tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon May 01 09:58:46 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Adjectives + Rovers
- From: [email protected] (David Barron)
- Subject: Re: Adjectives + Rovers
- Date: Mon, 1 May 1995 09:58:40 -0700
At 12:27 AM 4/29/95 -0400, R.B Franklin wrote:
>
>On Fri, 28 Apr 1995 [email protected] wrote:
>
>> Although we are permitted to say <machbe'>, we are not permitted to say
>> <yotlh machbe'Daq> because TKD p50 Sec. 4.4 says that <-qu'> is the only verb
>> suffix allowed when a Type 5 noun suffix is added.
>>
>> Personally, I am sticking my neck out. I feel that the verb suffix rover
>> <-be'> is just as logical an addition to the [stative] verb. However, I
>> certainly will not go against TKD's injunction.
>
>I agree with you on this point. I think also think it is logical and
>unambiguous.
How about something like:
Beacuse of the black ship the battle was won.
Duj qIjmo' Qap may'
I suppose you would change that to:
Dujmo' qIj Qap may'
qar'a'?
David
>> peHruS
>
>yoDtargh
David Barron [email protected] OR [email protected]
Klingon Language Postal Course
PO Box 37, Eagle ID 83616
IT'S FREE! Send Self-Addressed Stamped Envelope.
Not available by E-mail, so dont ask.
David Barron [email protected] OR [email protected]
Klingon Language Postal Course
PO Box 37, Eagle ID 83616
IT'S FREE! Send Self-Addressed Stamped Envelope.
Not available by E-mail, so dont ask.