tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Fri Mar 10 10:08:46 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: E pluribus unum: $0.02-wIj
- From: Wouter Slegers <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: E pluribus unum: $0.02-wIj
- Date: Fri, 10 Mar 1995 19:08:42 +0100 (MET)
- In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> from "Mark E. Shoulson" at Mar 9, 95 01:24:01 pm
< "LYNN.WD" ([email protected]) writes stuff like "YOU WHAT????" and
< "THIS IS A LOAD OF SHITE!!!"...
<
< Er, I'm afraid you have us at a disadvantage here. Could I ask what you're
< talking about that you're responding in such a manner? The grammatical
< discussion under the subject header you used didn't seem all *that*
< controversial. Please respond privately if you'd rather not speak on the
< list.
<
< ~mark
<
Excellent response ~mark... 3 out of 3 points (Old Klingon counting
system :)
Qapla'
Wouter
----8<----- CUT HERE -----8<---------8<------- FOR RECEIPT -----8<-----
This proves that I have NOT received ANY message from Wouter Slegers.
Wouter Slegers, 3rd year CS, [email protected]||[email protected].
Disclaimer: If the above sounds plausible, reread it several times!
GCS 2.0: d-(++) H s+: !g au- a- w+ v+>+++ C++++++>++ UI+>+++ UL+>++++
L+>++ 3 E--- N++ K W----- M- !V> po- Y+ t++(+++) 5+ jx R G? tv
g+++ D+++ B---- e+>++ u- h>++ f+ r- n---(----) Y?