tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Jun 07 12:08:13 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: "be'taH" v. "petaQ"

• From: David Barron <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: "be'taH" v. "petaQ"
• Date: Wed, 7 Jun 1995 12:08:06 -0700 (MST)
• In-Reply-To: <Pine.SOL.3.91.950607095316.24471A-100000@rocky> from "Christopher Dicely" at Jun 7, 95 01:17:30 pm

> 
> 
> I think all the talk of computer analysis misses the point (and, quite 
> frankly, is a bit obsessive, but that, itself, is also beside the point).
> 
HIja' jay'!
"obsessive"qu'law' qechvam wIja'chuqbogh jay'

"be'taH" "petaQ" ghap vISovbe' 'ej vISaHbe'

david b

• References:
  • "be'taH" v. "petaQ"
    • From: Christopher Dicely <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: Re Coffee
• Next by Date: Re: Re Coffee
• Prev by thread: "be'taH" v. "petaQ"
• Next by thread: Re: "be'taH" v. "petaQ"
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level