tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sun Jan 22 12:15:23 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: nuqneH
On Sun, 22 Jan 1995, Silauren, Half-Elven wrote:
>
> On Sat, 21 Jan 1995, William H. Martin wrote:
>
> > According to tlhIyQa:
> > > *Latin* Hol vIjatlh.
> >
> > Fine. Some might argue that *Rome*ngan Hol would be a better
> > term...
>
> personally, here i'd either use <*Roman* Hol> or <*Latin* Hol>. after
> all, most people on the list refer to english as <*English* Hol>, not
> <*England*ngan Hol>. *shrug* but maybe that's a personal bias against
> constructing compound nouns in klingon... don't mind if you do it, as
> long as i can understand it, i just prefer not to...
>
We have a canon term for English (well actually Federation Standard)
don't we?
DIvI' Hol (isn't this on CK?
> > > tlhIyQa
> >
> > charghwI'
>
> --naQ'avwI'
------------------------------------------------------------------
Jason K. Green [email protected]
------------------------------------------------------------------