tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Jan 19 08:39:59 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]

Re: "HolQeD" 3:4

Guidovo':

>So, I saw three articles this time by people prying apart basic grammatical
>principles and stretching interpretations of canon to try to be able to
>invent new, even more incredibly ridiculous word formations and neologisms,
>Glen being the biggest stinker about this, 

And the other two...?  I can see one other which you might be referring to,
but I hope you are not referring to mine.  One thing I explicitly strove to
do
was NOT to suggest new word-formation / interpretation techniques on the
basis of my analyses.  I simply wanted to compare two different Klingon
grammatical constructions to each other, and see what we can learn
about them in the process, since the description in TKD is so sketchy.
I didn't propose new things, in fact, I proposed to limit old things.  {{:)

--Holtej

Back to archive top level