tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Wed Feb 22 12:28:02 1995

Back to archive top level

To this year's listing

• Index by Date
• Index by Thread
• Index by Author

Re: KLBC: Question about -bogh

• From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>
• Subject: Re: KLBC: Question about -bogh
• Date: Wed, 22 Feb 1995 15:27:59 -0500
• In-Reply-To: <[email protected]> ("ADM::RSORENSEN"@tiny.computing.csbsju.edu)

All this stuff about suffixes on the head-noun is *exactly* the same topic
as has been argued over and over here.  We've taken to calling it the "ship
in which I fled" problem (maybe not the best example sentence).  It's a
matter of (a) how if at all can you mark something not the subject or
object as head-noun, and (b) how if at all can you make the head-noun of a
relative clause fill a different role in the main sentebnce than it does in
the relative clause.  And the answer is we don't know.  Yet.

~mark

• References:
  • KLBC: Question about -bogh
    • From: "ADM::RSORENSEN"@tiny.computing.csbsju.edu

• Prev by Date: Re: Bucket of tongues (was: Re: Looking for Nick Nicholas)
• Next by Date: Re: Looking for Nick Nicholas
• Prev by thread: KLBC: Question about -bogh
• Next by thread: Re: KLBC: Question about -bogh
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread
  • Author

Back to archive top level