tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Aug 14 16:04:29 1995
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: Re[2]: }} Re: (no subject)
- From: "Mark E. Shoulson" <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: Re[2]: }} Re: (no subject)
- Date: Mon, 14 Aug 1995 16:04:29 -0400
>Date: Mon, 14 Aug 1995 15:35:40 -0500
>From: [email protected] (Soqra'tIS)
>ghItlh r'Hul (~r-r-r-r-r'Hul vIjatlhta' >}};-) ):
>>On Mon, 14 Aug 1995 ~mark wrote:
>>
>>>I also liked the one about "che'taH tlhInganpu', boltaH
>>>tera'nganpu'"... tho that too works best in English.
>>
>>>:-)
>>
>>
>>Ummm. I can't find <bol>. Help.
Erg. <bol> is a one-way word, I'm afraid. Oops. It occurs on the
English-to-Klingon side of the dictionary, but not the Klingon-to-Engish
side. Look up "drool" in the E->K side. You can see why it works in
English.
>>>~mark
>>
>>r'Hul
>methinks honored sir had "{boj}" in mind... (hey, it fits!).
Nope, honored sir was thinking a word that's hard to look up and unfairly
didn't say so.
~mark