tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Sat Mar 19 07:05:49 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: "rIn"
- From: trI'Qal <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: "rIn"
- Date: Sat, 19 Mar 1994 15:00:44 -0400 (EDT)
Qanqoroyvo':
>Well, I hate to correct the corrector, but we have a problem here.
>This is misuse of rIn. rIn does NOT mean "to finish, to
>accomplish". rIn means "to BE finished, accomplished" (emphasis
>added, duh). You could use rInmoH, or you could use the verb ta'
>(as opposed to the suffix), which does indeed mean "to accomplish."
>
> --Krankor
QI'yaH! HIvqa' veqlargh!
I need to learn to type as fast as I think. I had intended to put 2 emaples
using <rIn>, and put only one (incorrect) one. the first was <tugh jInmolwIj
vIrInmoH> (as Qanqor read from my mind), the second was simply <tugh rIn
jInmolwIj>.
Actually, I am glad that you caught this... it tells me that you didn't just
let me do this, and then leave me all on my lonesome. {{:)
jIpup vIneH, 'ach wej jIpup 'e' vISov....
vaj HIlughmoHtaH!!!
--HoD trI'Qal
tlhwD lIy So'