tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Mon Apr 18 06:40:30 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: Grammar question
- From: trI'Qal <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC: Grammar question
- Date: Mon, 18 Apr 1994 17:15:41 -0400 (EDT)
Bilvo':
> Uu> proposed change, and indeed would do it as: chaq DaHjaj yInmeH QaQ
> Uu> jaj. [Yep, apophasis].
>
>Umm.. apophasis?
That's two of us... please don't use technical terms some of us don't have
terran dictionaries handy to look up. {{;)
>I think I'm in dire need of assistance in the proper way of translating the
>-meH suffix into English! (Have you addressed this one in HolQeD yet,
>Captain?)
Let me address this one in my next post... at least, a little bit. :)
>... bIchep bIneHchugh, quv DaquvmoH 'e' Daqaw
Oooh! I like this quote! "If you want to prosper, remember to honour
honour!" I see only two faults with it: You need to have <DaneHchugh>, and
if you wanted it to be an imperative (the way I gave the English translation),
you need it to be <yIqaw> (pages 33-34 of your handy-dandy Klingon
Dictionary...)
--HoD trI'Qal