tlhIngan-Hol Archive: Thu Apr 07 04:21:41 1994
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next]
Re: KLBC: qajatlh
- From: trI'Qal <[email protected]>
- Subject: Re: KLBC: qajatlh
- Date: Thu, 07 Apr 1994 16:17:31 -0400 (EDT)
Holtejvo':
>qorvo'
>
>> wo' Degh boghaj'a'?
>
>HIja', Degh vIghaj.
>
>> naDev Degh DalI''a'?
>
>pa' 'oH vIlI'laH.
>nuqDaq DaneH 'e' choja'.
Ewwww! I don't like that last sentence... primarily because it looks like it
should have an imperative prefix on <ja'>. I will buy the double-object for
<ja'>, and the use of nuqDaq, but I would have just simply said: nuqDaq
DaneH? Much simpler. {{:)
--HoD trI'Qal